Advent Reflection #18: The Nicene Creed Meets C.S. Lewis

I love the historic creeds of the church.  They are touchstones of historic orthodoxy and assist me in the pursuit of loving God with my mind, according to true thoughts about Him.  This past Sunday, we affirmed our faith as a congregation using the Nicene Creed, which dates to 325 A.D.  In this Advent season, it was the second section, concerning the Son, that was especially helpful (to me, at least!).  I set it out below for your own reflection and celebration, and then will follow it up with an excerpt from C.S. Lewis on the value of historical theology, which might just be helpful to some of you creed-skeptics out there…..

The Nicene Creed (2nd section)

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God,

begotten of His Father before all worlds,

God of God, Light of Light,

very God of very God,

begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father;

by whom all things were made;

who for us and for our salvation

came down from heaven,

and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary,

and was made man;

and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate;

He suffered and was buried;

and the third day He rose again according to the Scriptures,

and ascended into heaven, and is seated at the right hand of the Father;

and He shall come again, with glory, to judge the living and the dead;

whose kingdom shall have no end.

C.S. Lewis on the value of theology

…I quite understand why some people are put off by Theology.  I remember once when I had been giving a talk to the R.A.F., an old, hard-bitten officer got up and said, ‘I’ve no use for all that stuff.  Bu, mind you, I’m a religious man too.  I know there’s a God.  I’ve felt Him:  out alone in the desert at night:  the tremendous mystery.  And that’s just why I don’t believe all your neat little dogmas and formulas about Him.  To anyone who’s met the real thing they all seem so petty and pedantic and unreal!’

Now in a sense I quite agreed with that man.  I think he had probably had a real experience of God in the desert.  And when he turned from that experience to the Christian creeds, I think he really was turning from something real to something less real.  In the same way, if a man has once looked at the Atlantic from the beach, and then goes and looks at a map of the Atlantic, he also will be turning from something real to something less real:  turning from real waves to a bit of coloured paper.

But here comes the point.  The map is admittedly only coloured paper, but there are two things you have to remember about it.  In the first place, it is based on what hundreds and thousands of people have found out by sailing the real Atlantic.  In that way it has behind it masses of experience just as real as the one you could have from the beach; only, while yours would be a single glimpse, the map fits all those different experiences together.  In the second place, if you want to go anywhere, the map is absolutely necessary.  As long as you are content with walks on the beach, your own glimpses are far more fun than looking at a map.  But the map is going to more use than walks on the beach if you want to get to America.

Now, theology is like the map.  Merely learning and thinking about the Christian doctrines, if you stop there, is less real and less exciting  than the sort of thing my friend got in the desert.  Doctrines are not God:  they are only a kind of map.  But that map is based on the experience of hundreds of people who really were in touch with God–experiences compared with which any thrills or pious feelings you and I are likely to get on our own are very elementary and very confused.  And secondly, if you want to get any further, you must use the map.  You see, what happened to that man in the desert may have been real, and was certainly exciting, but noting comes of it.  It leads nowhere.  There is nothing to do about it.  In fact, that is just why a vague religion–all about feeling God in nature, and so on–is so attractive.  It is all thrills and no work:  like watching the waves from the beach.  But you will not get to Newfoundland by studying the Atlantic that way, and you will not get eternal life by simply feeling the presence of God in flowers or music.  Neither will you get anywhere by looking at maps without going to sea.  Nor will you be very safe if you got to sea without a map.  In other words, theology is practical….

(Mere Christianity, Book Four, Chapter 1, “Making and Begetting”)

 

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: